New Ingenious research has revealed that mitigating the effects of IHT, capital preservation and control over assets were listed as first, second and third, respectively, as the most important factors when advising on estate planning1. Indeed, IFAs cited that having confidence that any IHT would be fully mitigated was the most appealing factor when selecting a BR service. This was followed by factors such as the level of investment risk, level of investment return and costs.
A staggering 93% of advisers polled cited speed of IHT mitigation, as well as maintaining access to and control of client assets, as the primary motives for recommending BR-qualifying investments to their estate planning clients. The market for BR-qualifying services has traditionally been homogeneous with financial planning success contingent upon investors surviving two years unless an investor pays for additional insurance cover, which could be as much as 13% of the capital invested. Consumer Duty has brought about a renewed focus on good outcomes, however. As a result, IEP Apex is the only BR-qualifying service that fully mitigates the effects of IHT from day one of share allotment by incorporating complimentary IHT cover into the estate planning service as standard, paid for by the Manager instead of the investor.
Over half (55%) of IFAs believe the biggest challenge facing their business in the future is keeping up with regulatory changes such as Consumer Duty. The research also highlighted that in order to align with the new Consumer Duty rules, two in three (66%) IFAs believe their own research and due diligence processes will need to change to demonstrate how ‘good outcomes’ for retail clients will be achieved. When you couple that with the fact that three quarters (74%) of advisory firms surveyed use third party research firms to create BR panels of suitable investment managers1, this suggests that the way in which advisers work with third party research firms to create such panels also needs to change as part of a industry-wide reset to deliver good client outcomes.
1Research carried out online with 97 IFAs between 13th October – 27th October 2022
2Research carried out via online poll with 436 IFAs in June 2021
3Based on internal research
To learn more about IEP Apex, and its additional care service, click below, and one of our team members will be in touch.
With the new Consumer Duty rules focusing minds on outcomes, fair value, and avoiding foreseeable harm, we are seeing advisers seeking solutions aligned with these values and, in particular, IEP Apex and the unique benefits it offers investors.
So what is it that makes Apex so attractive?
Advisers have told us that mitigating the effects of IHT is their top-ranked factor when advising on estate planning2, and that speed of IHT mitigation is the primary motive for recommending BR-qualifying investments3. So, new services that remove the risk of planning failure in the first two years are a game-changer, especially when it is achieved without additional costs to investors.
That’s why we’re seeing advisors turning away from high cost, low value business relief services in favour of services that mitigate IHT risk from day one of share allotment.
If Consumer duty and delivering good outcomes for customers is a priority for your and our firm, isn’t it time you turned to Apex?
1Tax Efficient Review, June 2021
2 Ingenious survey 2022
3 PFS/Ingenious 6 Golden Rules webinar live poll 2021
To learn more about IEP Apex, and its additional care service, click below, and one of our team members will be in touch.
With the first FCA Consumer Duty deadline in October, there has never been a better time to ensure you’re matching the right products to your clients’ needs.
When it comes to business relief and ensuring complete IHT mitigation, IEP Apex is a Business Relief (BR)-qualifying service that includes complimentary IHT cover for the initial 2-year qualifying period paid for by the Manager. That means no additional cost to investors, or impact on returns, as well as removing risks associated with IHT qualifying periods.
How IEP Apex aligns with the new Consumer Duty
The new Consumer Duty requires firms to ‘act to deliver good outcomes for retail customers’. IEP Apex is designed to align with the Consumer Duty requirements by:
Delivering good outcomes
By removing risks associated with IHT qualifying periods.
Avoiding foreseeable harm
The risk of IHT planning failing as a consequence of early death is now avoidable, without an impact on returns from fee-based life insurance add-ons.
Demonstrating outcomes
Effective estate planning relies on mitigating the effects of IHT. IEP Apex enables advisers to demonstrate how this can be achieved.
Price and value
IEP Apex offer a comprehensive solution at what we believe to be some of the lowest fees in the market. Considering its unique utility, it’s arguably a great example of fair value.
To learn more about IEP Apex, and its additional care service, click below, and one of our team members will be in touch.
Ingenious Media is proud to announce that 4 British films produced by investee companies managed by Ingenious have received British Independent Film Award nominations.
Emily
Best Lead Performance: Emma Mackey
Best Supporting Performance: Fionn Whitehead
Best Ensemble Performance: Ensemble including Amelia Gething, Emma Mackey, Oliver Jackson-Cohen, Fionn Whitehead, Alexandra Dowling, Gemma Jones, Adrian Dunbar
The Douglas Hickox Award (Best Debut Director) sponsored by BBC Film: Frances O’Connor
The Lost King
Best Lead Performance: Sally Hawkins
Elizabeth: A Portrait in Parts
Best Editing: Joanna Crickmay
The Phantom of the Open
Best Music Supervision: Phil Canning
Well done to all nominees.
Did you know the market for Inheritance Tax “IHT” planning solutions has changed?
New Business Relief (BR)-qualifying services are more effective at mitigating the effects of IHT. This means firms need to update their research and product panels to avoid taking risks that are now avoidable.
As you likely know, the market for BR-qualifying services has traditionally been homogeneous, with planning success contingent upon investors surviving two years or paying for additional insurance cover, which could be as much as 13% of the capital invested. That was then, but now things have changed with the launch of IEP Apex. This new BR-qualifying service fully mitigates the effects of IHT by incorporating complimentary IHT cover for the initial 2-year qualifying period, paid for by the Manager.
Does your research and due diligence focus on what matters the most?
In light of the new Consumer Duty rules and the renewed focus on good outcomes, research and due diligence should also focus on outcomes first. Here are three considerations to be made when selecting BR solutions moving forwards;
If the client is looking to fully mitigate the effects of IHT, will the solution achieve that in all cases?
If a solution is contingent on the client surviving two years, how can you demonstrate that you have avoided foreseeable harm?
Would you be able to demonstrate that the third-party review service you use have considered all of market, as currently not all of them do?
Ingenious Media is proud to announce that five films produced by investee companies managed by Ingenious have been selected for the Venice and Toronto Film Festivals.
The Son: produced by Neddy Dean Productions. Adapted by Florian Zeller and Christopher Hampton (The Father, Dangerous Liaisons), from Zeller’s acclaimed stage play, Hugh Jackman (The Greatest Showman, X-Men) stars as Peter whose busy life with his new partner is thrown into disarray when his ex-wife Kate, played by Laura Dern (Marriage Story, Jurassic World), arrives with their troubled and distant teenage son, setting the family on a dangerous collision course. The film will hold its world premiere in competition at the Venice Film Festival and will then receive a Gala Presentation in Toronto.
Butcher’s Crossing: produced by Conqueror Productions. Based on the seminal novel by John Edward Williams, Butcher’s Crossing is a frontier epic that follows a young Harvard drop-out into the Colorado wilderness as he joins a team of buffalo hunters in search of a mythic herd of buffalo. Little does he know, the journey will put his life and sanity at risk. Detailing a gripping and largely untold chapter in American history, Butcher’s Crossing is a riveting commentary on human nature, masculinity, and man’s relationship to his natural environment. Starring Nicolas Cage (The Rock, Leaving Las Vegas) the film is directed by Gabe Polsky and will receive its world premiere as a Gala Presentation at the Toronto Film Festival.
Allelujah: produced by Great Bison Productions. Richard Eyre (Notes on a Scandal, Iris) directs an adaptation of the stage play written by Alan Bennett (The Lady in the Van, The Madness of King George). Set in a Yorkshire geriatric hospital Judi Dench (Belfast, Shakespeare in Love) and Jennifer Saunders (Absolutely Fabulous, Death on the Nile) star in this spirited homage to the idiosyncrasies of old age and the fortitude of health care workers. The film will receive its world premiere as a Special Presentation at the Toronto Film Festival.
The Lost King: produced by Magaritz Productions stars Sally Hawkins (The Phantom of the Open, The Shape of Water) and Steve Coogan (Stan and Ollie, Philomena). In 2012, having been lost for over 500 years, the remains of King Richard III were discovered beneath a carpark in Leicester. The search had been orchestrated by amateur historian Philippa Langley, whose unrelenting research had been met with incomprehension by her friends and family and with scepticism by experts and academics. Directed by Stephen Frears (The Queen, Dangerous Liaisons) this is the life-affirming true story of a woman who refused to be ignored and who took on the country’s most eminent historians, forcing them to think again about one of the most controversial kings in England’s history. The film will receive its world premiere as a Special Presentation at the Toronto Film Festival.
Emily: produced by Popara Films. First time feature film director Frances O’Connor brings the life of Emily Bronte to the big screen with Emma Mackey (Death of the Nile, Sex Education) playing the eponymous writer of Wuthering Heights. O’Connor has assembled a stellar ensemble cast including Oliver Jackson-Cohen (Mr. Malcolm’s List, The Invisible Man), Fionn Whitehead (The Duke, Dunkirk) and Adrian Dunbar (Line of Duty, The Crying Game). The film will hold its world premiere in the competitive Platform section at the Toronto Film Festival.
Last year, Ingenious ran an educational webinar when we revealed the ‘Six Golden Rules‘ which, in our view, one could apply when selecting the most appropriate unlisted Business Relief (BR) services for clients looking to conduct some proactive estate planning.
Since then, we have fielded many questions as to the priority in which one should apply those rules. Now we deliberately didn’t seek to prioritise them, as when applied properly they all could reveal a factor or issue about any service that might mean they are assessed as more, or less, suitable for a client.
However, one should remember that if the goal of estate planning is to pass on the maximum of a client’s wealth to their chosen beneficiaries when they die, anything one can do to ensure that a client is able to protect their estate, grow their wealth and mitigate the potential effects of IHT are what counts towards this goal.
However, in the same vein it is also possible to identify ‘Six Potential Oversights‘ anyone could make which might pose a risk to their advice, their clients’ outcomes, the beneficiaries’ wishes and ultimately retaining their business.
At a recent webinar, we were told by the audience that the primary motive to undertake estate planning is to eliminate, or reduce, the potential IHT burden clients’ estates will be subject to on their death*. However, this could be missed if one focuses on solely the investment risk present in any potential solution, as the IHT efficacy may actually play a much larger role in the success or failure of the proposed financial planning strategy. For example, should a client be invested in a lower risk investment within a solution which is only IHT effective after seven years and then the client dies after two, the advice has palpably failed the client. Bearing in mind the impact of IHT can mean a loss of 40% of the estate value, the result of not doing everything possible to eliminate IHT risk could be far greater that the assumed extra investment risk in doing so.
We all have a duty to understand the investments we recommend to our clients. As a result, many choose to utilise independent due-diligence to give them an easy snap-shot across the whole market to assist them in comparing rival managers’ services. However, this broad picture cannot be relied on in isolation and to provide the most robust process advisers should overlay their own judgement, having accessed all the relevant facts on these services. See our Six Golden Rules.
It is noticeable that the fee models for a lot of unlisted investment services can be confusing and hard to assess and compare. However, it is vital to fully understand not just the magnitude of any investment costs, but how this may impact the performance of the service and what it may imply about the level of risk the manager is taking.
Many managers make a big issue of the fact they may only charge a modest annual management charge (AMC) if a set “hurdle” target is achieved over the life of the investment. What appears even better, is that they also suggest they will defer the taking of this annual charge until that exit point. In these cases it is highly likely the manager is also charging another annual fixed “service” fee which typically is greater than the other quoted AMC, and it is not contingent on any performance target and will be taken annually rather than deferred.
Lastly, understanding the full cost burden of any service can be a good indicator as to the level of risk being taken by the manager. Basically, to make a net positive return a manager must take greater risk for every percentage of fees they take to earn those fees back.
Not all unlisted BR services are valued the same way. Many services are valued and audited in order to calculate their Net Asset Value (NAV) but some then declare a separate, and floating, share price which may not match the audited NAV. If this is the case, and the share price is higher than the NAV, any incoming clients are buying shares at more than their “break-up” value which exposes them to the risk that should the trading company cease trading or needs to be broken up, they may only get back less than they invested and indeed thought that they owned.
Many investors value the concept of instant or fast liquidity in an unlisted investment. Many believe a service that offer redemptions in 10 days is superior to one that offers redemptions in 30 or even 60 days. Some managers also tell them this. But what if maintaining that liquidity impacted the level of funds actually deployed on trading activity? What if that faster liquidity actually meant holding significant capital back to meet those requests, which inevitably has a negative impact on investment returns? Why would the beneficiaries care if it took 20 days more when probate is typically taking more than twelve months anyway? Surely, they would want to have selected the service with the best estate planning effect so they get the best value and absolute maximum of growth?
There can be a natural assumption that the biggest must be the best. But one should consider the impact AUM actually plays in the goal of effective estate planning. Does a larger office or more staff actually benefit investors? It’s our view that the previous metrics above are probably a far more accurate predictor of which managers and services offer the chance of achieving a better outcome to clients. So, deciding which metrics are the most relevant to the outcome clients are seeking is key to selection criteria.
As mentioned above these have been the key areas that seem to cause the most uncertainty and we believe we offer some answers but if have any more issues where you would like some clarity please contact us at investments@theingeniousgroup.co.uk
*Ingenious/PFS Webinar – Six Golden Rules – Oct 2021
Over the last few decades a lot has changed in financial services, but one thing has remained the same: the difficulty experienced by many advisers in getting their clients to commit to estate planning.
There have been many articles detailing the continued rise in inheritance tax receipts, and as the continued freeze of nil rate bands drags more and more people into the IHT net, public awareness of IHT has never been greater. It is supposedly the one tax that nobody likes paying, so why do clients often shy away from doing something about estate planning?
Whilst every individual is different, and they all have their own reasons, these challenges often fall into three areas.
Starting the discussion – the challenge of discussing money and death with families
Whilst the pandemic has made people more aware of their mortality, acknowledging this and then being able to discuss it with their nearest and dearest is often difficult for many people. And that’s before the discussion turns to how their wealth may be distributed amongst beneficiaries. As a result discussions are often postponed for another day, but sometimes that can be too late.
As an independent expert in estate planning matters, a financial adviser is perfectly positioned to help families navigate these difficult discussions together in an objective, supportive and practical way. Whilst helping families find a way through intergenerational matters can be challenging, clients will frequently say that a weight has been lifted from their shoulders once they begin this process with a trusted adviser. It is extremely rewarding to see the impact that these discussions can have on clients and their families. Playing such a role can also help advisers develop broader relationships within the family which may ultimately assist them with the question of intergenerational transfers and retaining an advisory relationship with the next generation.
Engagement and actions – connecting with hearts and minds
Whilst obtaining client agreement to start the discussion is the beginning, being able to engage with different family members in a positive and supportive way requires a certain deftness of touch, without which good client intentions remain just that.
This is where the full range of an adviser’s skillset comes into its own. Advisers will generally feel very comfortable playing that independent and objective role in these discussions and advancing the logical outcomes of alternative outcomes. In addition, emotions surrounding the discussion will inevitably need to be managed so that family members all feel listened to and common ground can be established for without this last part, the family may not ultimately take any action or decisions may be delayed as consensus has not been reached. These can be difficult discussions for us all to have, especially if we put ourselves in the position of the people being advised but advisers can nevertheless play this role very successfully.
Finding the right solution – balancing control, certainty and performance
Fundamental to the successful outcome above is the answer to the question advisers will inevitably be asked: what do you suggest we do? Sometimes, clients simply don’t buy the recommended solution as it isn’t compelling enough and decisions are put off for another day. But without the right products and solutions, the financial plan may not fully deliver the outcome the client really needs, particularly if it involves an unacceptable compromise.
The objective of estate planning for most people is to provide the best possible legacy for their beneficiaries whilst allowing for their own life needs. At a high level this is simple. Plans must:
As we know, it is not easy to achieve that combination as some aspects conflict. Many people find gifting and trust planning unpalatable due to the lack of access to capital. More flexible trusts have been popular in the past, but many are put off by the length of time they take to be fully IHT effective. They have also become expensive as the chargeable lifetime transfer, periodic and exit charges may erode the intended benefit.
As a result, many advisers have turned increasingly towards the use of Business Relief-qualifying investments to meet their objectives as the risk of planning failure due to mortality is reduced to two years. This only reduces the risk of failure – it doesn’t remove it. Insurance solutions can be added to actually remove mortality risk and ensure the effects of IHT are mitigated whenever a client dies, as long as the premiums are paid. The challenge with that approach is that premiums can be significant, and may erode the value of the inheritance over time. Costs remain too high for many to contemplate going down this route.
Advisers therefore also need help from product providers in the form of innovation, to furnish them with more compelling solutions which encourage clients to take action.
It’s not hard to see why estate planning falls down the priority list when talking to clients. It’s not fun to talk about. For anyone. However, having the conversations about the emotional impacts for both them and their loved ones can really help ease clients’ fears, and move them toward a solid plan. And with new services on the market every day, advisers can start building plans that are more likely to achieve their clients’ goals.
Last July I wrote an article considering the potential impact of rising inflation on clients in later life (Later-life and estate planning in an inflationary environment – FTAdviser.com). At the time RPI was increasing at a rate of 1.7% per annum (1), with the OBR predicting a medium-term average of 3% pa. Well, as at 18 May it is now 11.1% per annum (1), and the highest it has been since January 1982 (12%) (1).
In my original article I referred to the 1970s and the last period of sustained high inflation, and how those that were starting out in adult life now find themselves in later life. I looked at the parallels and considered how those clients and their advisers might work together to address the effects of inflation on their later life and estate planning.
However, this new period of high inflation in which we now find ourselves is markedly different from the last, it is worse in many ways and in particular for those in later life. A perfect storm of rising costs and poor returns is hitting middle England, a group that is already being squeezed due to changes in age and gender related demographics and lifestyle. Before considering how advisers may be able to help them, let’s firstly consider the pressures they are under.
The Real Return Crisis
Whilst inflation has yet to hit the peaks of the 1970s and early ‘80s, as I have mentioned it is at its highest point in more than 30 years. That’s where the similarities end though. In May 1982 bank base rate was 13.13% (2), so savers were still seeing a real rate of return of 1.13% per annum. Contrast that with May 2022 where we have a bank base rate of 1.0% (2) and a real terms loss of 10.1% per annum. A swing in annual real rate of return of c.11.23% is huge
Savings and income are being eroded at an unprecedented rate at a time when most tax allowances and thresholds have been frozen, adding to the squeeze. But prices of goods and services increase at differing rates, the rise in the costs of essentials is disproportionately great and therefore is hitting those hardest who can least afford it.
2. Bank Rate history and data | Bank of England Database
The Care Crisis
The cost of care provision is already eye-wateringly high, and will remain so despite the forthcoming care cap. However, it’s almost impossible to see how this won’t get worse still when you consider that the core costs of care provision are human resource, food and energy (heat) all of which will likely be at the higher end of the inflation basket.
Rising costs, paired with eroding savings mean that care provision could become even less affordable for many, and this will inevitably mean that many middle-aged workers will be forced to provide care for their elderly relatives whilst still working, and likely still providing a home for their children who are unable to get on the housing ladder.
This is already becoming a significant problem as 22.3% (3) of workers aged 50-59 are also providing care to others. This rises to 23.9% (3) for workers aged 60-69. If, as seems likely, this is happening because the costs of care are skyrocketing, then these numbers will only increase as costs continue to rise and inflation takes further hold.
Medical advancements mean that people are living longer (5), which we all hoped would be a good thing. Unfortunately, this is just adding fuel to the fire. Longer lives are not necessarily healthier ones. Recent statistics from the ONS show that, on average, males will spend 16.2yrs (6) of their lives in poor health, and females even longer at 19.4 years (6). Increased life expectancy simply increases the need for care provision, putting even more pressure on the care system, those working as well as caring and it becomes a vicious circle, people will increasingly need support whether that be financial or guidance.
4. Life expectancy in care homes, England and Wales – Office for National Statistics (ons.gov.uk)
5. Living longer – Office for National Statistics (ons.gov.uk)
6. Health state life expectancies, UK – Office for National Statistics (ons.gov.uk)
Perfect storm for the squeezed middle
The wealthy can frequently escape these crises relatively unscathed as they have sufficient resources and access to professional support and guidance. Those with little in savings or assets are also not likely to feel the full effects of these challenges as they are often supported by the state.
It is those in the middle who are most likely to feel the pain, and who will have to adapt the most by making changes and re-plan their finances. Those that had planned to leave their savings to their children may now find that they need to repurpose those funds to meet their own needs – not to mention possibly funding care for their own parents. This may lead to dipping into savings to meet costs which previously would have been covered by income.
Given all the challenges they face, there has never been a time when middle England has had a greater need for advice, and yet only the minority actually seek it, as evidenced by the UK Advice Gap Report by Open Money (7). Without advice, this group could be making mistakes that put them even further behind in meeting their financial goals.
7. UK Advice Gap Report 2021 | OpenMoney (open-money.co.uk)
What can the financial services industry do to help?
All stakeholders need to help increase the visibility of and access to advice. It is also incumbent upon all parties to be proactive and not to freeze in the face of this financial pandemic. There are some very specific things the financial industry can do to help clients achieve the best possible outcomes for themselves and their loved ones.
Advisers
Product providers / investment managers
At Ingenious we are committed to helping advisers through education and support but also by developing innovative solutions which aim to deliver greater certainty and peace of mind for advisers and their clients
Never has there been a time when clients have needed their advisers more. Advisers have a vital role to play by making sure they understand the pressures their clients are facing, how those might change and what solutions are available to help them by staying on top of developments and working proactively with product providers to fully understand how they can support them now and into the future.
Footnote:
Ingenious is a specialist investment manager focused on the media, real estate, infrastructure and education sectors. To find out more about Ingenious and their flagship estate planning service IEP Apex visit www.theingeniousgroup.co.uk/iep-apex/
Ingenious backed Crimes of the Future from the legendary director David Cronenberg will hold its world premiere at the upcoming Cannes Film Festival. Starring Viggo Mortensen, Léa Seydoux and Kristen Stewart, the story is set in the not too distant future in a time when humankind has learned to alter their biological makeup – some naturally and some surgically.
In an interview with Deadline, asked about going back to Cannes following the controversy surrounding his 1996 film Crash, the director said “Well, I’m not nervous. I’m looking forward to it because you make a film to have people react to it. And, as usual — and I’ve said this many times — I’m not making a movie to shock people or assault them. I’m saying, “These are things I’ve noticed. These are ideas I’ve had. These are dreams that have troubled me. I’m showing them to you. You can interpret them as you wish. I just think you maybe would be interested in experiencing these things as I have experienced them.” That’s my approach, and you get a huge variety of responses. “
Cronenberg has been an inspiration to filmmakers and audiences worldwide with films such as The Fly, A History of Violence and Eastern Promises. Crimes of the Future will be released in France following its Cannes premiere and in June in the United States.